Online vs. On-Campus College Rankings: Why the Methodology Matters
ON THIS PAGE
Metrics Challenges Online-Specific OnlineU Conclusion
Key Takeaways:
- Many online college rankings measure things like campus culture, in-person instruction, and physical infrastructure 鈥� metrics developed for a campus-based university experience that can misrepresent online program quality.
- Federal higher education data is limited when it comes to online-specific data points, making it difficult to evaluate online degree programs in the same way as in-person programs.
- Understanding ranking methodologies can help students make smarter choices about which college program is right for them.
Online programs are a great solution if you want to earn a degree but have a busy schedule, are already working, or don't feel like attending in-person classes is right for you. But with so many options, how do you find the best online college? Chances are, at some point you'll turn to college rankings for help.
Here's something you might want to know first: most of those rankings weren't built for you. That's not because the rankings publishers are trying to pull a fast one, however. It's more because the metrics that power most college rankings were developed to measure how well a residential university serves the students who are attending a traditional in-person program. The problem is that when these metrics are applied to online programs, they're not measuring what's most important to online students.
This article explains what most traditional rankings measure, what happens when those measures are used to evaluate online programs, and what metrics can help when choosing an online program. If you use rankings to help in your online college research, which you probably should, understanding the methodology behind them will help you use them more effectively.
What the Metrics Behind Most Rankings Actually Measure
Most college rankings aren't designed to be misleading. Originally, they were designed to answer questions about which colleges possessed the best academic reputations, the most faculty resources, and the smartest students. The thinking was that the colleges with the highest marks in these areas would turn out the most successful students. In the context of a "traditional" college experience, those considerations make sense.
Let's take a closer look at some of the metrics we're talking about and what they're intended to measure:
Peer Assessment Surveys
These surveys ask academics and employers to rate universities based on reputation. Institutional prestige has generally been built over decades and is based on factors like:
- Producing graduates who end up in high-level, visible careers
- Employing faculty who publish influential research
- Having alumni who stay connected to, and often help support, the school
While this doesn't tell you much about individual programs within a university, it does give you an idea of how successful a school's alumni are perceived to be by academics and professionals.
Graduation and Retention Rates
Earning a degree at the end of a program matters, so these metrics are collected to show how successful a school is at supporting its students all the way through to completion. What these numbers can't account for is why a student didn't finish 鈥� dropping out because you can't afford the final year of courses isn't the same as failing out because you're not studying, even though they both count as a "did not complete." For on-campus students, factors like housing stability, support services, and student life can also have an impact on degree completion.
Student-to-Faculty Ratios, Class Sizes, Research Spending
These metrics all speak to the physical infrastructure of an institution, and they matter to the students who use that infrastructure every day. A lower student-to-faculty ratio, for example, might mean more personalized feedback and greater access to faculty mentorship.
Admissions Selectivity
The point of this metric is to indicate the quality of a school's student body. The idea is that schools which are harder to get into attract students who are better prepared, and that competition results in a higher level of student who is more likely to be successful. Therefore, a degree from one of these schools means more.
These data points aren't bad, but they're not as useful when taken out of their intended context. Let's take a quick look at the common ranking factors measured by six of the biggest college rankings publishers to get a better idea of how the most popular ranking factors are used in practice. The table below shows which metrics are used in on-campus or online rankings, and which ones can truly be online-specific.
Ranking Factor Usage And Scope (Can It Be Online-Specific?)
*Reflects common factors used by leading college rankings publishers. Not all publishers use all factors listed. 鉁� = present in methodology; 鈥� = not present or not applicable.
What Happens When You Apply Traditional Ranking Factors to Online Programs
The problem isn't with the ranking factors themselves. It's that they are often applied to online programs as-is, despite many of them not telling you much about the online experience.
Reputation Scores
These mostly come from the history of a residential university's faculty, research output, on-campus culture, and career outcomes of graduates across all programs over many years. A middling online program at a well-regarded institution will score well on reputation, while a strong program at a regional university that has invested in its online infrastructure and student support may score poorly. The score reflects the institution's brand, not the quality of its online programs.
Graduation Rates
The federal database most publishers use 鈥� the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System () 鈥� does collect and report field-of-study graduate numbers. However, it doesn't separate online-only from hybrid programs, and it can't be correlated to enrollment data to find online-specific graduation rates. When rankings use graduation rates in their methodologies for online programs, consider it a rough estimate at best.
Campus Resources
Student-to-faculty ratio, research spending, and campus health services tell you nothing about what it's like to be enrolled in an online program. A university might have a beautiful campus and a great student-to-faculty ratio, but those don't help an online student dealing with an outdated and slow online course delivery system. Campus resource metrics also won't help you identify a school with excellent online student support if the rest of its resources are limited.
Selectivity
Many online programs are designed to serve working adults, career changers, and other students who aren't following a traditional degree path. Ranking programs partly on how hard they are to get into rewards schools for being selective, not for serving their students well. For open enrollment or career-focused programs, selectivity data means little.
The Data Gap That Makes It Harder to Rank Online Programs Effectively
To understand why rankings rely on these metrics, it helps to know a bit of relevant history. The collection of higher education data in the U.S. dates back to the mid-1960s and was started largely to support the administration of Title IV financial aid at accredited institutions, which were mostly residential campuses.
Distance education programs , primarily through mail correspondence courses and radio and television broadcasts, but were mostly unaccredited until the 1960s. There were even early versions of around this time, although online education wasn't widely available until the 1990s and widespread enrollment didn't really start until the 2000s. Despite these advances in how people could earn degrees, the data collection system only recently started to catch up.
The two main federal higher education databases are IPEDS and . IPEDS started collecting information on distance education in 2012, but even now it's mostly structural. Currently, IPEDS collects four main data points related to online education:
- Institutional Characteristics 鈥� whether a school offers online courses or programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels
- Fall Enrollment 鈥� the number of students by those enrolled exclusively online, partially online, or not at all
- 12-Month Enrollment 鈥� the same as Fall Enrollment but covers the full academic year (added in 2020)
- Completions 鈥� the number of degrees or certificates awarded for programs offered via distance education
These metrics can tell you whether online programs exist at an institution and roughly how many students are in them, but they don't give you graduation rates, retention rates, or debt and earnings figures specific to online students.
College Scorecard adds additional information for online students but is also limited. At the program level, it flags programs that are offered fully online, which helps confirm that a school has online programs. It also provides enrollment numbers, costs, and median earnings and debt at graduation.
However, the earnings and debt information are for all graduates of a program, not online students specifically. And Scorecard's outcome numbers are based on first-time, full-time students, which completely leaves out the working adults, part-time students, and transfer students that make up a large portion of online enrollments.
The result is that there still isn't a ton of federally available, reliable data specifically designed to measure what matters to online students. But there are things we can look at beyond campus-based metrics to help people searching for online programs make more informed decisions.
What Metrics Help Students Find the Best jmcomic漫画s?
A few questions consistently pop up when prospective students are surveyed about their decision-making process while choosing an online program:
-
What does it actually cost?
-
What is it like to go through the program?
-
Did it help graduates find or advance in their desired careers?
These questions make sense when you consider that online students tend to be employed full time and often have career-focused reasons for enrolling. They may need to balance school with work, family, or caregiving responsibilities. Rather than looking for the right social environment for their first "adult" experience out of high school, they want to know if a degree program fits their life and will pay off career-wise. So let's look at some data points that can answer these three critical questions.
Tuition
Tuition is one of the clearest metrics available for comparing what an online program might cost. By itself, it won't tell you the actual cost of a program 鈥� you need a net price estimation for that 鈥� but it gives you a quick baseline for comparing the cost of a program at one school versus another. Along with program availability, cost is consistently among the top factors in enrollment decisions.
The catch is that tuition is among the hardest data points to locate: only about a third of students actively searching for tuition data can easily find it on a school's website. Rankings that include verified tuition and allow for easy cost comparisons are genuinely useful, as most students are already looking for that information.
Student Experience
Student reviews are the most direct available evidence of what it's actually like to attend a school or program. They have their drawbacks, as some reviews are informed by strong feelings, and a single bad experience can result in an opinion that doesn't reflect how most feel about a school/program.
But consistent patterns across a large number of reviews can reveal things that no federal dataset captures: whether advisors are responsive, if instructors are helpful or if students must be self-directed, and if a program's pace and structure work for someone who's also raising a family. These are questions that can't be answered through reputation surveys and graduation rates.
Salary Outcomes
Graduate earnings data is worth paying attention to, as it helps inform how effective a school can be at getting students to their desired outcome. However, since federal data sources on earnings aren't online-specific, these numbers are mostly helpful as a comparison point between schools.
Want to dive deeper into the free tools available for online college research? Check out our guide to the freely available online research tools provided by the federal government.
How These Metrics Inform OnlineU's Rankings
OnlineU's current ranking methodologies are built around these principles. Verified tuition data and student reviews are the primary quality factors, with graduate and earnings data providing context. It's simpler than most competing methodologies, but that's by design.
Ranking methodologies with half a dozen factors may look rigorous, but if the data points used aren't specific to the concerns of online students, then they're not measuring what actually matters to those students. The simplicity of our methodologies reduces the noise in order to focus on what the data can honestly support.
That said, we acknowledge the limitations in our methodologies. Tuition data isn't the same as net cost, but net cost can vary quite a bit from program to program and school to school. We've found that manually verified tuition provides a better apples-to-apples comparison for prospective students comparing similar programs between schools.
Also, the student reviews we've collected include both online and on-campus students. We scope to online reviews when we can, but it's not always possible to do that and still give you a broader overview. Combining these review-based perspectives with salary outcomes will still give you a clearer picture of what it's like to attend a school or program than campus-centric metrics alone.
Curious how OnlineU approaches rankings? We've broken down our methodology beyond the data to tell you more about the numbers we use and those we don't.
What This Means When You're Reading Rankings
Most students use rankings as a starting point when researching online programs, which we wholeheartedly recommend. However, using rankings without understanding what they're measuring can be misleading.
When you come across a ranking for the best online colleges, it's worth taking a few minutes to look at the methodology page. If it relies on reputation surveys, graduation rates, or admissions selectivity 鈥� well, now you know how those relate to what you're looking for.
We're not saying that metrics like reputation surveys are completely useless for online students. Regardless of how well an online degree program might prepare you for a career, brand recognition does matter in some fields to some employers. But keep in mind that metrics like these don't measure an online program's quality, so they shouldn't be the primary basis for your decision.
For your research, we recommend using tuition or net cost data and student reviews as two of the most relevant metrics for evaluating online programs. They're directly measurable and can inform the three biggest questions most online students have about the programs they're considering. Graduate earnings are also helpful, just keep in mind that they often report on more than just online students, and there's no way for you to tell the difference.
About the Research Behind This Article
Analysis in this article draws on several sources. Information on how online college students choose a school comes from the jmcomic漫画 Students 2024 report published by , which surveyed enrolled online college students on their motivations, priorities, and research behaviors (2024 was the most recent report available at the time of publication).
Insights into actual student experiences are informed by an analysis of approximately 1,300 verified student reviews of undergraduate and graduate programs offered by the top schools based on review rating, as collected and measured by OnlineU and its companion platform . Reviews were analyzed for recurring themes rather than individual opinions, with patterns weighted by frequency and consistency.
Data on federal higher education reporting comes from two main sources:
- The History and Origins of Survey Items for the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (, 2023), which documents the evolution of IPEDS data collection and the introduction of distance education variables.
- The Institute for Higher Education Policy (), whose analysis of College Scorecard data updates identified limitations in federally available data on online student outcomes.
Ranking methodology details for the table were drawn from publicly available pages published by each ranking organization we analyzed. Contact us for more details.